This is the beginning of the design discussion for a multi-tenancy system for federated mapping. All design questions, comments, and further threads belong in this area.
Here's the new corpora app dev site: https://corporadev.grcschema.org/.
First, the question should be - do we maintain a separate corpora site from the rest of the federated mapping projects, or do we incorporate the corporate into federated mapping?
I would vote we incorporate the corpora into federated mapping. Thoughts?
I was thinking the application we are building could be an all-in-one with sidebar navigation to different components of federated mapping: including corpus management and research. We can rename the subdomain later.
Sean Kohler, CTO
p. 702.805.2467
Unified Compliance
www.unifiedcompliance.comhttp://www.unifiedcompliance.com
"My computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick-boxing." -Emo Phillips
From: admin--- via Grcschema grcschema@listserv.grcschema.org
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 7:47 AM
To: grcschema@listserv.grcschema.org grcschema@listserv.grcschema.org
Subject: [Grcschema] Re: Federated Mapping Multi-tenancy design
Here's the new corpora app dev site: https://corporadev.grcschema.org/.
First, the question should be - do we maintain a separate corpora site from the rest of the federated mapping projects, or do we incorporate the corporate into federated mapping?
I would vote we incorporate the corpora into federated mapping. Thoughts?
Agreed. I’ll post something later about the various left-navigation parts.
—
Best,
Dorian J. Cougias
Managing Director
GRCSchema.org
10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
(o): 702-805-0662
(c): 650-255-3552
From: Sean Kohler skohler@unifiedcompliance.com
Date: Thursday, February 18, 2021 at 9:26 AM
To: grcschema@listserv.grcschema.org grcschema@listserv.grcschema.org, Dorian Cougias admin@grcschema.org
Subject: Re: [Grcschema] Re: Federated Mapping Multi-tenancy design
I was thinking the application we are building could be an all-in-one with sidebar navigation to different components of federated mapping: including corpus management and research. We can rename the subdomain later.
Sean Kohler, CTO
p. 702.805.2467
Unified Compliance
www.unifiedcompliance.comhttp://www.unifiedcompliance.com
"My computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick-boxing." -Emo Phillips
From: admin--- via Grcschema grcschema@listserv.grcschema.org
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 7:47 AM
To: grcschema@listserv.grcschema.org grcschema@listserv.grcschema.org
Subject: [Grcschema] Re: Federated Mapping Multi-tenancy design
Here's the new corpora app dev site: https://corporadev.grcschema.org/.
First, the question should be - do we maintain a separate corpora site from the rest of the federated mapping projects, or do we incorporate the corporate into federated mapping?
I would vote we incorporate the corpora into federated mapping. Thoughts?
Other important links:
The “frames” of the application: https://corporadev.grcschema.org/
The first of the screens
The documentation has been started here: https://short.grcschema.org/app-shell
—
Best,
Dorian J. Cougias
Co-Founder and Compliance Scientist
Unified Compliance Framework
10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
(o): 702-805-0662
(c): 650-255-3552
CommonControlsHub.com
ComplianceDictionary.com
STIGViewer.com
UCFMapper.com
UCFResearch.com
UnifiedCompliance.com
From: admin--- via Grcschema grcschema@listserv.grcschema.org
Date: Thursday, February 18, 2021 at 7:47 AM
To: grcschema@listserv.grcschema.org grcschema@listserv.grcschema.org
Subject: [Grcschema] Re: Federated Mapping Multi-tenancy design
Here's the new corpora app dev site: https://corporadev.grcschema.org/.
First, the question should be - do we maintain a separate corpora site from the rest of the federated mapping projects, or do we incorporate the corporate into federated mapping?
I would vote we incorporate the corpora into federated mapping. Thoughts?